| Inconsistency without explosion of belief UnterstĂŒtzendes Argument1 #1150 Lucas's argument depends on the assumption that if humans were inconsistent, they would be committed to believing anything and everything. But this conclusion follows from a rule of propositional logic we have no reason to believe holds for humans. |
It is quite possible for minds to be both inconsistent and coherent.
Douglas Hofstadter (1978). |