Highly flexible systems aren't mechanistic
But a machine that generates new programs, treats its machine table is a changing object, and shifts between programs would involve auxiliary devices that can't be modelled on the Turing machine (as Dennett presupposes).
Dennett presupposes that a machine that can take the guise of multiple formal systems is a Turing machine.

The need for auxiliary devices that can't be modelled on a Turing machine means that the machine Dennett describes is not a mechanistic model of the mind.

Thomas Tymoczko (1990).
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence Â»Artificial Intelligence
▲
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7] Â»Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
▲
No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems Â»No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems
▲
Gödel limits formal systems not machine implementations Â»Gödel limits formal systems not machine implementations
■
Highly flexible systems aren't mechanistic
+Kommentare (0)
+Verweise (0)
+About