Persons are not brains
The complete argument that persons are automata must include a missing third premise that "persons are brains". But this third premise is false, so the conclusion that persons are automata doesn't follow.
The complete argument is:

1) Neurons are automata.

2) Brains are collections of neurons.

3) Persons are brains.

4) Therefore, persons are automata.

But, the third premise is false.

Selmer Bringsjord, 1992.

Note: see also the "Can Computers be persons?" arguments on Map 1.

Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence Â»Artificial Intelligence
▲
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7] Â»Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
▲
Yes: Automata can think Â»Yes: Automata can think
▲
Brains are automata, thus persons are too Â»Brains are automata, thus persons are too
■
Persons are not brains
►
No: computers can't be persons Â»No: computers can't be persons
+Kommentare (1)
+Verweise (0)
+About